Meet the Emeritus Director — a Conversation with Helen Purcell

(Helen Purcell served as director of Living Wisdom School for more than 30 years. She retired in 2024.)

Q: What does Living Wisdom School offer children that other schools do not?

A: Most parents who inquire about the school are worried about two things. They want a personalized education for their children, but they also want rigorous academics. Often, they feel that if you have one, you can’t have the other. At Living Wisdom School, we’ve shown that you can provide both, with excellence.

Helen Purcell, Director, Living Wisdom School, Palo Alto, CaliforniaQ: Do the children receive individualized attention?

A: Our small size allows the children to move through their education fluidly, with attention to their individual needs. Our student-teacher ratio is approximately one to eight.

If a child is ahead of grade level, that’s not a problem here, and if a child is behind, that’s also accommodated. I have a boy in my eighth-grade class who’s doing high school senior level math. He has the ability to become a world-class mathematician, and we’re helping him learn at a pace that’s appropriate to his abilities.

We’re small enough that if a child has any kind of an issue, the entire faculty knows about it and can help the child. Nothing is compartmentalized, and nobody falls through the cracks.

We also have a fabulous parent community. The parents are highly interested in their children’s well-being, and it isn’t unusual for a parent to share his or her special expertise in the classroom. One mother who’s a scientist taught science here for two years. It was a marvelous experience for the children, and for her. Another parent taught a unit on marketing and computers, in which he showed the children how to create a PowerPoint presentation, complete with text, charts, and slides.

Q: You emphasize “spiritual” education. Are you a parochial school?

A: We are not a parochial school, even though the main school building is located next to church grounds, and two of our classrooms are in the church office building.

Our belief is that each religion, in its essence, encompasses the universal truths embodied by our school rules. Thus, for example, Rule Number One is: “Enjoy yourself!” As we interpret it for the children, it means that if you really want to enjoy yourself, you must be concerned for the happiness of others, and for the single, deeper Self of which all religions speak.

When we speak of “spirituality,” we aren’t talking about blind belief or intellectual abstractions. We’re talking about some very down-to-earth, practical principles. For example, spirituality is what happens in math and science classes where we teach the children about the unity of all living things.

In fact, that’s an excellent illustration of a spiritual principle that has profound implications for learning. Brain researchers have discovered that when children are given opportunities to make associations between their separate school subjects, they become better learners, because associative thinking creates new dendritic connections in the brain.

Thus, if a child can understand a math concept simply by looking at the printed page, that’s certainly all well and good. But if you can connect the math concept in the child’s mind with science, poetry, and music (which we do all the time), the child becomes a better learner.

We are extremely sensitive to the need to create these connections, and it’s one of the reasons why there’s a great deal of thematic integration in our curriculum.

Q: Are your teachers well prepared in math and science?

A: Over the years, we have developed a math program with depth and breadth that excites even those children who may not be especially gifted in math.

At our year-end ceremonies, the younger kids get to stand up and tell what they like about the school. And over and over, they say “I love math!” Our math and science teachers communicate the love that talented mathematicians and scientists feels for their subject. Their classes combine lecture, lab, and projects.

Q: You emphasize the performing arts. Why is that?

A: We place a tremendous emphasis on the arts, though by no means to the detriment of science and math.

Many of our parents are Silicon Valley scientists, engineers, and computer professionals, and they tend to be a skeptical initially when we talk about the arts program. But we’re very balanced. And, in fact, some of our best student-scientists and mathematicians are also our best violinists, artists, singers, and dancers. We want to educate the head and the heart.

We’re very clear about this, and the performing arts program is a glowing example. Each year, we challenge the students to participate in a play that has the sophistication of a very advanced high school production. We then support them in stretching their minds, hearts, and wills to rise to the challenge of performing.

The play is an enormous stage for exercising and developing skills that help them tremendously in their academic development and progress: they learn to be completely focused on the subject at hand, they learn to “think on their feet” and to express themselves clearly, and they develop a passionate fire for learning.

The play is an excellent expression of our interdisciplinary curriculum, as well as how we educate the children’s hearts and minds.

One year our theater production was Jesus of Nazareth. As the children prepared, they became little biblical scholars. At the same time, they were studying Greek and Roman history and mythology, in order to better understand the historical background of the play.

When we produced a play about Kuan Yin, the Chinese goddess of compassion, we studied Chinese literature, history, and philosophy, and the children learned about Chinese art, music, and dance.

Year after year, as the children produce these plays, they internalize the great stories of the world. Thus, they receive priceless keys for deciphering great literature. But they’re not only studying related academic subjects; they’re learning to be poised and graceful, to concentrate, cooperate, and receive direction and feedback.

Q: Do they enter into the experience willingly, or do you have to push them?

A: They are so excited! And it’s their enthusiasm that motivates them to master the challenges.

For example, the vocabulary of the play is always far beyond the third-grade level. So the third-grade teacher simply makes it part of the children’s vocabulary lessons.

joan_of_arc_poster
Poster for the annual school play several years ago.

They learn to use the dictionary, and they master the big words until they’re able to listen to the play and understand the meaning of the lines. The children also pick up vast stretches of each other’s parts, so it isn’t as if they’re learning only their own parts in isolation. They become verbally very sophisticated, because as they say the words with understanding, and those words become a permanent and meaningful part of their verbal repertoire.

Q: You seem to be saying that the arts stimulate learning of all kinds.

A: Exactly. And the children not only learn a great deal about intellectual subjects, as well as social and character development; but they’re receiving non-denominational spiritual instruction by acting out the lives of great teachers in all spiritual paths and traditions.

By performing these great epic stories, they learn about the play of light against darkness. In the context of the life of a great soul, whether it’s Buddha, Jesus, Krishna, Moses, St. Francis, or Joan of Arc, they are offered the possibility that they can confront evil and win. Year after year, they’re acquiring a repertoire of heroes against whom they can measure their own efforts to lead a good life. And they know what it means to love God and “love your neighbor” through participating in the lives of these great examples.

Q: Do those lessons rub off in the classroom?

A: Yes, emphatically, they do. And they also rub off on the playground. On the playground, you find out how well you’re doing, or not doing as a person. These are just normal children, and they do get into conflicts. We don’t pretend that they won’t. But when they do, we have a conflict resolution program in place from kindergarten through eighth grade. And the lessons they learn from putting on these plays transfer to the playground as models for how good behavior yields the highest happiness.

The father of a little girl in our school reported that his child has become the neighborhood referee, so that when the other children have a conflict, she faces them off and says, “Okay, you stand here, and you stand here. Look in each others’ eyes. You listen; you talk. Then you listen, and you talk.” And she encourages the children to come to their own resolution.

With the younger ones, the teachers need to provide the language. But with the older ones, the teachers can simply monitor the students’ energy, because the children are familiar with the process. “I didn’t like it when you did this to me.” And the other child knows he must acknowledge what the first child has said. Thus, through respectful dialogue, children can learn to reach harmony. In many schools, these issues of conflict and feeling are seldom addressed. And they are critically important for creating a harmonious, safe learning environment in which the students feel supported.

Q: How do the teachers earn the students’ respect?

A: Certainly by being real with them. We do not look away from anything. We face things head on, and we draw the parents in as needed.

One child began suffering from separation anxiety from her mother. She would get all the way to the door of the school, but she couldn’t come in. I was in contact with the mother, and we worked to help the child. Meanwhile, I shared with the other children that this little girl was having trouble coming to school. I said, “First of all, we’ll pray for her.” So we did healing prayers–which the children love. They pray for everything – pet rats, hamsters, parents, siblings, all in the same breath.

A few days later, they were out on their morning run, and they came around the corner just as she was getting back in the car. They went over and literally “loved her” out of the car – they tugged at her and said, “We want you to come!” And she came back into the classroom. Shortly thereafter, she had to decide whether she would go on a major field trip across the country. We bought her a ticket, and the day of the trip she came to the airport, but she was holding onto her mother’s hand with an iron grip. I thought, “I don’t know if she’ll be able to do it.” But at the last minute she got on the plane, and she sailed happily through the trip.

If you bring children into the reality of what’s going on, you have no trouble. But if you rely on unnatural authority, they know it’s fake, and they don’t respect it. That’s true in any school, but we have a student-teacher ratio that allows for a kind of personal attention that enables the children to develop a respect for the teacher, the school environment, and each other..

Q: Many people believe that time spent addressing feelings is just time that’s lost for learning.

A: Some parents say, “I’m going to let my child attend this magical school, and after three years I’ll take him out and put him in a real school.” But I tell them, “The children who’ve gone all the way through Living Wisdom School have done extremely well not only in public high schools but in highly rated academically focused college prep schools. They thrive not only academically but personally.”

Q: Does the children’s enthusiasm for academic subjects affect how they feel about the teachers?

A: When you have a vibrant curriculum that draws out the children’s enthusiasm, it truly does help cement the relationship between the child and the teacher.

The children aren’t afraid of us. They feel perfectly fine about coming up and asking how we are. They treat us with the greatest respect, but there aren’t the usual barriers, because the children feel the teachers’ authenticity, and that what we’re doing here is real. And it helps us be much more effective as teachers and counselors.

One little boy misses his dad who has to travel for business and is away a lot. So his teacher trained the child to take a running start and leap into his arms and give him a big hug. It’s in these small vignettes where you can see the relationship between the teachers and students, and the quality of attention the children are receiving.

 

Philosophy of Living Wisdom School

What do you want for your child?

What are your hopes and dreams for your child? Not just for kindergarten, but for the whole of his or her life?

Financial security? A good job? A nice home?

Material goals are necessary and worthwhile. But many intangibles are surely also worth considering, such as happiness, character, and peace of mind.

boy smiling at living wisdom school, a PreK-8 private school in palo alto, californiaWe all want our children to acquire positive values and ideals, as well as a deep understanding of the meaning of life. What role will your child’s school play in helping him or her to become an inwardly strong and secure person? No influence outside the home has a greater impact than the child’s school.

Education Reflects Parents’ Goals

Little attention is paid in schools nowadays to developing children’s values. But values are the road map that helps children understand where true happiness lies. And what if your dreams for your child extend beyond material fulfillment? Will educating your child for a good job be enough?

Intellectual training is essential; it’s difficult to succeed in our culture without it. But life teaches us that success and happiness depend to a great extent on human skills such as knowing how to get along with others, how to persevere in achieving our goals, how to focus our attention, how to cooperate, and how to be a loyal friend.

At Living Wisdom School, we feel that children should benefit from the storehouse of wisdom that humanity has gathered through the ages concerning the best ways to achieve a happy, fulfilled life. We feel it is our God-given duty to teach children these essential life skills, staring at a young age. An education that gives children the tools they need to achieve both inner and external success is a useful education, indeed!

For more than forty years, we have seen that children who are taught how to have a happy life are more likely to achieve academic success as well. (Please don’t take our word for it. See What Parents Say.)

At LWS, children learn the life skills they need to be balanced, mature, effective, happy, and harmonious human beings. We call this art “Education for Life,” because we continually relate the children’s classroom lessons to life as a whole. At LWS, we study not only the great things that people have done, but the human qualities that enabled them to attain those achievements.

Secrets of Success

Before we can be happy and inwardly secure, we must know a great deal about the world around us. We need to learn to interact appropriately with the people and circumstances in our lives, because life doesn’t always mold itself to our personal expectations.

We must be ready to adjust to realities outside our own. We must learn practical skills, and we must master academic knowledge. Education for Life helps children prepare for maturity on every level: physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual.

More Than Natural Talent

First-graders with teacher Erica Glazzard, Living Wisdom School, Palo Alto, CaliforniaAt Living Wisdom School, we guide children in developing the five “tools of maturity”: body, feelings, will, mind, and soul. With health and high energy, expansive feelings, dynamic will, and mental clarity, each child can experience a gradual increase of awareness that provides them with a solid inner sense of meaning and joy.

We gauge our students’ success not only by their academic results but by the quality of each child’s attitudes, effort, and interactions with others. In an Education for Life, the children practice dealing successfully with whatever life may bring.

True Teaching is Individual

Children reveal a broader range of individual traits than adults, who may have learned to mask their individuality in order to fit in. Rather than force the child to conform to strictly standardized learning methods, we feel it makes better sense to discover the child’s essential strengths and encourage them. When children’s individual strengths are continually and consistently encouraged and reinforced, they develop self-confidence and enthusiasm for learning.

Our classes are kept small, so that the teachers can work closely with each child. The teachers are trained to assess each child’s physical, mental, and emotional development and guide the child accordingly. The teachers relate to the children much as their parents do, from the perspective of the child’s ever-changing needs. We respect and encourage individuality.

Joy in the Classroom

We feel that we have a responsibility to help the early years of each child’s life be a joyful experience, while laying the foundation for a happy adulthood.

Child with Bubble, Living Wisdom School, Palo Alto, CaliforniaIn a Living Wisdom classroom, the atmosphere is relaxed and family-like, while at the same time there is order, discipline, and a clear sense that the teacher is in charge. Living Wisdom School teachers win the children’s respect by skillfully guiding their enthusiasm and energy into the tasks at hand. The children learn that they are expected to behave with consideration and respect, and that they can approach the teacher for individual guidance.

Creating a positive learning environment isn’t, by itself, sufficient to transform the children into angels. At LWS, the same issues, interactions, and challenging transitions occur that we would expect to see in any classroom. What’s different is that the children are given opportunities to learn effective, enlightened ways of dealing with situations as they arise.

The Inner Life

At Living Wisdom School, the children’s natural spirituality is acknowledged and encouraged. Each classroom has a universal altar, with symbols from the world’s religions. The classroom may be decorated with objects that the children consider personally sacred and spiritually meaningful.

At Living Wisdom School, spirituality isn’t defined as a particular dogma or creed. Thus, it isn’t “religious instruction” in the traditional sense. Rather, the focus is on the child’s personal, direct experience of universal spiritual truths such as kindness, compassion, empathy, loyalty, honesty, and courage. The key is Self-realization – the individual realization that happiness increases as we expand our awareness to embrace ever-broader realities.

Every morning, and occasionally during the day, we set aside time for chanting, singing, quiet meditation, affirmations, prayer, yoga postures, and other uplifting activities. Through these forms of worship, the children experience for themselves what it feels like to be in harmony with a higher level of consciousness.

Children meditating at Living Wisdom School in Palo Alto, California
Students at Living Wisdom School learn non-sectarian, scientific breathing and concentration techniques for calming their bodies and minds and focusing attention.

When it’s appropriate, we hold discussions and answer the children’s questions about spiritual truths. The children discover that expansive feelings, thoughts, and actions increase their own sense of well-being, whereas contractive feelings and actions take that happiness away. “Right and wrong” thus become first-hand experiences of the consequences of personal behaviors, rather than a fixed set of abstract rules.

The children become deeply interested in changing their behavior when they realize that it is an effective way to increase their inner sense of joy. At LWS, children talk as readily and naturally about God, angels, saints, and the spiritual side of life as other children talk about sports or TV.

The Importance of Good Teachers

Math and science volunteer and Harvard graduate Richard Fouquet had a long, successful career as an engineer and flight manual publisher. Click to enlarge.
Math and science volunteer and Harvard and Stanford graduate Richard Fouquet had a long, successful career as an engineer and flight manual publisher.

“Who you are speaks so loudly, I can’t hear what you’re saying!” This adage is especially true when it comes to selecting teachers. Living examples can inspire children much more effectively than rules. A teacher who deeply understands his or her subject is better able to awaken a similar love and commitment in the children. LWS is built around our teachers’ open-hearted sensitivity to the children in their charge. It is essential, therefore, that in his/her life, the teacher expresses the positive attitudes, spiritual and moral values, and maturity that we seek to impart to the children.

Our teachers participate in Education for Life as a lifelong process. Each teacher is deeply involved in personal development, and the teachers receive ongoing support and training to stay fresh, enthusiastic, and expansive.

 

Meaning at an Early Age

A conversation with Living Wisdom School director emeritus Helen Purcell

(Helen Purcell served as director of Living Wisdom School for more than 30 years. She retired in 2024.)

Q: Living Wisdom School nurtures children’s sense of life’s joyous possibilities. How do you counteract the widespread belief today that life is meaningless?

Helen Purcell, Director, Living Wisdom School, Palo Alto, CaliforniaHelen: In our school, we feel that the relationship between child and teacher needs to be based on an authentic commitment to live life consciously, in alignment with high principles.

We have teachers who are “heart people.” They teach from the heart, and it can be very effective, because if the children sense that your heart is closed or judgmental, they’ll shut you out. True learning begins when you encourage children to have an open heart that is willing to embrace ever-wider realities. You can best do that when they feel safe, and children feel safe when they’re supported, and when they’re given a strong, clear sense of life’s positive meaning.

Our philosophy is so central to the children’s experience in our classrooms that it’s impossible to talk about how we approach the “crisis of meaning” without mentioning it.

I’m thinking of two separate examples that happened in the last two days. A little boy in our school had cousins visiting from India. One of the cousins spent a day in our first-grade class, and the other cousin visited my class.

After school, they told their parents that they really wanted to come back to our school the following day. The boy’s mother told me later, “We had offered to take them anywhere in the Bay Area, and we told them they could do anything they liked. But they said they really had to come back to your school.”

So they spent their vacation in school with us, because they couldn’t believe the feeling of it.

They told their mother, “The teachers are kind and the children are friendly.” And it’s not simply that the children in our school are taught good manners, or that they memorize a set of rules that they have to follow for getting along. It’s the result of something that runs much deeper in our school, and that supports the children by giving them a sense of meaning. It’s a culture that’s embedded in the school, based on our deep commitment to living life consciously.

Let me explain. I’m tempted to say that it’s all about joy. And, yes, that’s part of it, because children have tremendous energy and a natural wakefulness and presence in the moment. And if we can guide that enthusiasm rightly, they’ll experience a deep sense of security and happiness. So the children’s natural energy and awareness is something we treasure and nurture in them, because it’s the foundation for helping them find a lifelong sense of meaning, including a deep love of learning.

But we also find that when we nurture children’s natural ability to be present in the moment, tremendous learning can occur, so long as you’re presenting the curriculum in a way that brings out their natural eagerness and enthusiasm.

It means that as teachers we aren’t just imparting a fixed curriculum, plodding through the book. We’re noticing how each child is responding – where their awareness is at each moment, and how we can guide them through the curriculum in a way that builds on their native enthusiasm.

Naturally, the teacher is the center of the energy in the classroom. And this is especially important for the younger children. Because the teacher notices what’s going on in their lives and their hearts and minds, then with a little guidance you can help them feel very, very happy and secure in the classroom, and they can go happily from activity to activity.

And here’s the second story that I want to share. Yesterday, a little girl visited our school because she wants to enter next year. At our first meeting, her mother said, “If we enroll her, I’ll have to come to the classroom and stay with her because she’s so shy, and she can’t possibly come in by herself.”

I said, “That’s actually not a good idea. She needs to come visit us, and we’ll give her an experience of the school.”

But the mother wasn’t convinced. So I said, “You can come in for a few minutes, but then you’ll really need to leave.”

The girl was eleven, and she was literally hiding behind her mother when we met her, the way a kindergartner might behave on the first day of school. But after five minutes she had completely forgotten that her mother was there, because the students understood how to open their hearts, and they drew her in.

Later, when she got in the car to go home, her mother said, “How did it go?”

She said, “Mom, I want to start tomorrow!”

It was a huge transformation for her. And that’s the power of a culture that celebrates the positives and makes people feel safe and included.

Q: You’re creating a special atmosphere in the classroom?

Helen: I wouldn’t exactly call it an atmosphere, which suggests a mood that can change from one day to the next. It’s a culture that is deeply engrained in how we think and feel and behave. And it expresses in many ways. And because it’s very attractive to the kids, they internalize and duplicate it, so it grows.

Q: Creating a culture of meaning, purpose, and hope for the children – what does that require?

Helen: Of course, there’s a large amount of direct classroom instruction. But in an intimate setting such as ours, and with our favorable teacher-student ratio, there’s a tremendous amount of individualization.

Q: Is it based on noticing each child’s unique needs?

Helen: Yes. In our school, it would be impossible not to. Gary McSweeney, our middle school teacher, and I often laugh, because we both went to Catholic schools where there were fifty children in a classroom, ten in a row, all lined up with the nun in front.

And, well, it wasn’t all that bad at my school. But certainly there was no individualization, because it just wasn’t possible. But it would be almost impossible in our school not to individualize the curriculum, since we’re so accessible to the children, and because we’re always relating to each other one-on-one.

Teacher Erica at recess with her first-graders, Living Wisdom School, Palo Alto, California
Teacher Erica Glazzard at recess with her first-graders, Living Wisdom School, Palo Alto, California. All of the teachers are trained to help children understand basic laws of successful living, for example, that expansive attitudes such as kindness bring us happiness, but hatred and other contractive attitudes always result in unhappiness.

When I taught in a public high school, I had an interesting experience. At the end of the year I praised each student’s good qualities. And do you know what they said? “That can’t possibly be true, because you haven’t said a single negative thing about anybody!”

I said, “Of course, it’s true.” (laughs) So, you see, it’s a question of where you’re coming from. Are you only focused on ensuring that the children complete the state-mandated curriculum? Or are you concerned wholly and entirely with the success of each individual child?

Q: In her book, The Argument Culture, Barbara Tannen describes how in our culture we put every issue, whether it’s politics, religion, or education, in the context of an argument. For every pro, there has to be a con! And if you don’t bring out the negative and dwell on it in loving detail, people are programmed to think that you’re hiding something.

Helen: They think you’re “looking at life through rose-colored glasses.” But it’s a wholly false view to think that the negative defines us. Certainly, there’s negativity in the world, but our own happiness comes by expanding the positive aspects of our nature – and that’s a firmly engrained feature of our school’s culture.

This morning in our circle time with the children, we sang a chant, “Oh life is sweet, and death is only a dream, when Thy song flows through me.” Afterward, one of the girls said, “That isn’t true. Death isn’t a dream – death is real!”

So we talked about it. We talked about the life of the spirit, and how when you’re aware of spirit, the physical plane that we’re so familiar with is clearly seen to be less real, and that’s why the chant says that death is a dream. Because, as the saints of all times and cultures have told us, in our soul nature we never die.

I told them the story of Saint Francis, and how he was on his deathbed and singing joyously because he was so filled with God’s bliss. One of Francis’ fellow monks, Brother Elias, was concerned with the proprieties – he felt that a person should be very sad and grave when they die. So he scolded Francis. (laughs) And Francis said, “Oh, Brother Elias, but everything is so beautiful!” – even though he was blind and couldn’t actually see.

The children understood the story. But then a little boy said, “Do you mean that when I go to my mother’s funeral, I have to be joyful?”

I said, “Absolutely not!” And we talked about the human heart, and how our feelings, too, are very real to us.

And the point is, children will demand that degree of thoroughness when you teach them. And if you don’t give it to them, they’ll feel poorly served and they’ll tune out. In our classrooms, we make time to address these questions and not gloss over them because we’re hell-bent on keeping up with some fixed-in-stone government-mandated curriculum schedule.

So we make a point of pursuing those conversations. And it can be challenging to explain to parents and educators why it’s so terribly important. But it comes down to our basic philosophy, which says that if you can support and engage the whole child in the learning process, heart and soul and mind, you can create tremendous enthusiasm for learning. And we’ve found that being authentic in this way contributes tremendously to the children’s academic success, which is naturally a major concern of our parents.

Q: Reading the latest news about high school students who’ve become alienated and shot up their schools, one suspects that their rose-colored glasses have been ripped away. They weren’t taught to nurture their dreams and deal with life’s big questions.

Helen: A classroom is as complex as the most complex relationship, multiplied by however many kids there are in the class. And because we aren’t simply “delivering a curriculum,” we’re always addressing a very individual person. And there absolutely has to be a rapport that’s carefully developed between the teacher and the child. And when you consider that there are many individual learning styles, and learning disabilities, and differences in temperament and intelligence, you can see that it’s a multi-layered process.

The science of teaching is about knowing how to explain the various components of knowledge. But the art of teaching is about knowing how to do it in a very individual, detailed, and creatively choreographed way. If a teacher with little experience were to walk into one of our classrooms, they wouldn’t understand what they were seeing.

I walked into a classroom yesterday morning and found a little girl with tears streaming down her face. She tends to cry a lot, so you don’t always want to take it too seriously, but she was upset because she’d gotten braces and they were hurting her. Also, somebody had put yogurt in her lunch, and she hates yogurt, so she was mourning that she didn’t have a good lunch. So she was really crying, and I took one look at her, and I knew that the proper way to help her was to acknowledge her feelings but not get involved in a way that would encourage her to fall deeper into negativity.

So I acknowledged her feelings, and then I said, “Did you know that it’s Gary’s birthday?” Because she loves birthdays. I said, “You’ve been busy making a birthday gift for him, haven’t you? But it’s not finished, right? Why don’t you work on that?”

The tears stopped instantly, and for the rest of the day she was all right. But do you know how much time and energy went into that simple interaction with the student? There were all of the many, many times I had to figure out why she tended to do such-and-such, and why so-and-so worked for her, and so on. And that’s how we develop a deeper intuitive approach to doing what’s will help each child get free from negativity and find a positive sense of engagement and meaning.

It’s very, very complex, and I happened to hit the nail on the head that day. But, some days, you won’t find the “nail” right away because you haven’t known the student for long, and you don’t yet know how to work with them.

Q: You’re dealing with the children as whole people and not just brains to be filled with facts?

Helen: Oh, yes. They’re just as much people as we are, but they aren’t able to hide their feelings as well as adults can. So their feelings tend to be laid out there for you to look at, and then you can figure out how to help them.

Q: Does related to the children individually help them avoid becoming disenchanted?

Helen: Imagine a school that teaches children how to be kind, and to understand that their enjoyment depends on others’ enjoyment, and where no child, to a person, would ever be able to say “Somebody picked on me and nobody helped.”

That’s our culture. It isn’t as if the children in our school are saints. They’re normal kids, and they do get into it with one another. But because our culture is so well-defined and we’re all very clear about our values, these things are addressed immediately, as soon as they happen. If a child says something sarcastic to another child, we don’t dismiss it as a small thing to be brushed aside. “Get over it, Johnny!” We consider it an opportunity for both children to learn: the one child to learn to be more kind, the other perhaps to learn to assert himself.

Q: Are these some of the small things that nurture a child from inside, so that he or she doesn’t feel isolated or lonely?

Helen: Yes. There’s a sense of family that extends from the kernel of the classroom out to the entire school. It doesn’t stop at the classroom door – it plays out on the playground, and between the children and the teachers outside the classroom.

Our children feel comfortable with us. They approach us, not as peers, because there’s a definite level of respect, but they are not uneasy around us. They aren’t put off by our authority or by our roles, because they have a good sense of themselves, and they know that we have their interests at heart.

When the children feel good about themselves, and they feel that the teachers are accessible, you have a situation where almost anything can be worked out. But if there’s a group of kids that feel closed off, alienated and marginalized, that’s where you get the problems with depression, rejection, and meaningless.

Q: ABCNEWS.com on April 1, 2001 reported a nationwide survey of more than 15,000 teenagers conducted by the California-based Institute of Ethics. Of those teenagers, 21 percent of the high-school boys and 15 percent of the middle-school boys had taken a weapon to school at least once in the past year. Sixty percent of the high school boys and 31 percent of the middle-school boys said they could get a gun if they wanted one. And 16 percent of the high school students admitted to having been drunk at school. It’s amazing, the number of kids who have violence in their backgrounds, and it seems the kids who end up acting-out and shooting up their schools are just the tip of the iceberg. There’s a huge consciousness of violence in the schools.

Helen: There’s also a culture of exclusion, and it’s at the heart of the problem. In middle and high schools, belonging to an in-group is assumed to be important, and no one is combating this false consciousness. But it’s tremendously harmful to children, to have all this fear and anxiety around superficial things like status, and whether you’re a jock or a geek or a rich kid or a druggie. Only in a culture where there’s a generosity of heart can children bloom. And you’re extremely unlikely to find it in any kind of structure that is hierarchical and compartmentalized.

To a surprising extent, you even find it among the school teachers and administrators. I’ve heard the high school faculty lounge called “the snake pit.”

Someone told me they’re creating state and federal grants and funds to combat bullies in school. He said the governor of Colorado, acting through the state department of education, has outlawed the game of tag.

Q: Hurrah for hyper-rationalism!

Helen: Really, the solutions will never come by legislating them, or thinking about them in lofty isolation. Because they’re a matter of the heart. In our school, we assume that every child is perfect in his or her soul, and that the children need our help to manifest that perfection in the way their individual soul wants to. And that kind of progress isn’t something you can measure with numbers. But if you can do it, the rewards are great. When you nurture children individually, you create human racehorses who’ll be confident and competent in academics, relationships, and life.

We look for the beauty of the individual child, even the most difficult. We’re with them constantly, so we’re able to see the glimmers of light behind the mask. You know it’s there, and it’s a question of bringing it out.

Q: It seems you have a unified understanding of what children should get out of school. If there’s a keynote of the school, what would you say it is?

Helen: Again, my first impulse is to say “Joy.” But joy comes when you decide to take some very real practical steps, and you work hard at them. For example, according to one of our school rules, joy happens when we “choose happiness and practice kindness.”

Now this is a highly practical statement, because it’s very easy to verify it in our lives. We all know how it feels to choose to be happy and to treat others with kindness. It’s a simple, practical principle that the wise people of all ages have taught. But they never said it would be easy!

We’re very real in the way we guide the students. Maybe things aren’t going well in your life all the time. So you have to choose to come at your life from a point of inner joy. That’s the essence of our teachings.

Again, it’s working with the human reality and the inner reality both, because they aren’t separate. “We are our aspirations,” but we need to build our dreams on a realistic foundation. A child can feel overwhelmed by a mood, but they’ll be lifted by the other students who are managing to stay centered in those attitudes of kindness, compassion, and happiness that are a central part of the school culture.

We’ve had a cascade of kids who’ve gotten braces recently, complete with the full range of side effects, from braces that cut the gums, to headaches, to being unable to think, and not wanting to be at school.

They want to be good, but they don’t feel well. And do you know what the class does? The class prays for everybody who has braces. In the morning we do healing prayers for them, and you can honestly see the impact it has on those kids. Even if it doesn’t take the pain away, they have this incredibly powerful sense of friendship and support from their classmates, and it transforms their experience.

The other day, a little boy said to me, “Helen, can we say a prayer for my sister Heather? She’s coming in on the plane.” So we stopped in the middle of the lesson and we said a prayer, because it was okay.

It’s just one little thing, but when you multiply it by all the other little positive things that happen, it adds up. A child can’t figure out how to double-space on the computer, and someone will walk over and say, “I know how.” They don’t have to ask the teacher, because they know it’s okay to help each other.

Q: Helping each other with schoolwork is encouraged and accepted?

Helen: It’s accepted, and we give them freedom to act it out. When everybody’s operating from that point of origin – “I want to choose happiness, I want to be kind.” – nobody has to be in control in a rigid way that stifles their individual differences.

 

Creating a Caring Community

Michael Katz, Ph.D., Professor of Philosophy and Education at San Jose State University, spoke to Living Wisdom School parents at a breakfast seminar. Enjoy his talk, “Living Wisdom School: Creating a Caring Community.” A thoughtful discussion with parents (mp3 sound file) followed Prof. Katz’s talk


Breakfast Seminar with Dr. Katz

Living Wisdom School: Creating a Caring Community

by Dr. Michael S. Katz

Dr. Michael S. Katz is a professor of philosophy and education at San Jose State. He has written extensively on ethics in education and other topics related to childhood development. Prof. Katz received his doctorate from Stanford University. He presented this paper to the school parents at a Living Wisdom School breakfast seminar.

Dr. Michael S. Katz, Professor of Education and Philosophy, San Jose State UniversityI would like to thank Helen Purcell for inviting me here to speak with you about some of my impressions of Living Wisdom School and its relationship to the area I am most interested in as a philosopher of education—namely the ethical development of children—the development of their ethical sensibilities and their social and moral character, their capacity as persons to treat others well and to live satisfying and fulfilling lives as social persons. That is what I have been thinking about and writing about since 1983 when I taught my first course in the ethics of education at the University of Nebraska.

But I come here also as a former teacher and as a friend of Living Wisdom School—a truly remarkable school which deserves all of our support, and our full appreciation for what it has become—a caring, community that embraces the visionary ideal that students can grow creatively, spiritually, emotionally, intellectually by being allowed to exercise their minds fully and develop their personalities freely in a family-type environment—one that prizes their individuality, nurtures their spirituality, and honors their common humanity as persons.

My son broke a rule

I want to start out with a biographical anecdote, since I am a parent who has been married for 35 years, has two beautiful grown children and one gorgeous 14 month old grandchild Gabriella. In my second academic position, I found myself in Omaha, Nebraska, and my five year old son, Alan, was about ready to go to kindergarten. We had placed Alan in a Montessori school when he was threeand that went fine until one day when he was four and had brought cookies to school for his birthday—he apparently broke one of the school rules about not sitting on the line, and his punishment was that he was not allowed to have any of his own cookies when they were distributed.

This seemed very harsh indeed, a clear case where rules were elevated to a higher place than persons and their feelings. My son was emotionally and spiritually crushed by this simple misjudgment, and it called into question the practical wisdom of the school’s leaders and teachers. One depends mightily on the wisdom of teachers and their sensitivity to respond appropriately to our children—in all of their complexity. This is not to say that adults are not entitled to make mistakes in judgment; they all do, even the wisest of them, but our relationships with their teachers must be based on a thoroughgoing kind of trust that they can act regularly and systematically with the bests interests of our children at heart. This trust in their wisdom, their caring attitudes, and their ability to know what our children need to grow and flourish—is something that is built up slowly over time. But it is also something that can easily be destroyed with a single case of poor judgment, a single case of remarkable insensitivity.

That is what happened with our son and his Montessori school. When he turned four we did not put him back in the same Montessori school but placed him in a Jewish pre-school at the community center; there we had the painful experience of watching him through one of those one-way mirrors and noticing that he had no friends, did not interact with virtually any of the other children during play time, and looked rather sad and forlorn. We made good efforts to overcome this social isolation by inviting some of the kids over to the house, and little by little my son seemed to relax and make friends at the school.

Kindergarten boot camp

Then it was time to go to kindergarten. There were few alternatives to the public school, but we wanted to consider all of the alternatives. But my precocious little son had already developed his point of view. At one point he summarily told us: I want to go to the Millard Public Schools. I am five and I think I know what is best for my own education.” Be careful cultivating the intellect in your little children. Here I had my own little five year old existentialist son telling us to keep our nose out of his educational affairs. He could make his own rational decisions.

The problem was that he had no idea what kind of kindergarten he would find in the Millard Public Schools. He had a kindergarten teacher there named Miss Owens who ran her class like a hard-nosed sergeant in a U.S Marine boot camp. She suffered no disobedience, and she showed little warmth towards my son. At one point when he had coughed, she reminded him that there “were better ways to get the attention of an adult than coughing.” Prior to his first report card, he had told me that his kindergarten teacher had never once spoken to him as a person outside of the formal class settings, that she had showed no interest in him or what he paid attention to. This teacher and I talked on the phone, and I indicated that Alan seemed to have little interest in school; she listened, told me that he did not participate much, and we finished.

Middle school girls work together at Living Wisdom School in Palo Alto, California
Middle school girls work together at LWS. Caring is a natural expression of a mature awareness of others’ realities. (Click to enlarge.)

Three weeks later we got his first report card—about four pages worth of items, and there was not one single thing on the report card that was positive; a lot of satisfactory checks and a few unsatisfactory ones. No indication of who he was as an individual with a rich private world and an active imagination—someone who loved to be read to and was very warm and affectionate with his parents. So we asked for a parent teacher conference—and, unsurprisingly the school organized the conference the same way the western settlers organized their camps—they circled the wagons in full defense of an attack by the Native Americans whose land they were stealing.

The principal was there, the school psychologist, the teacher and us. When I informed them that my son had indicated that his teacher had shown no personal interest in him and had no conversations with him outside of class, this was categorically denied. “I show an interest in all of my children.” No examples of course. When I indicated that he seemed to have no interest in school, I was told that he would “do better if he showed interest.” The dialogue was absolutely useless; no strategies were suggested for improving my son’s attitude. We were made to look like we were the “bad guys” questioning how the school experience was affecting our son. All the blame was laid at his feet. When I informed my son that his teacher had said that he would do better if he would show more interest in his classroom activities, he simply looked at me, incredulously, and said: “What am I supposed to do Dad, pretend I am interested when I am not.” Words of wisdom from a five year old—but that is what alienated, high-achieving kids learn to do in the public schools—pretend to be interested when they are not.

Establishing a private school

In any case, toward the end of that academic year, I was invited to participate in establishing a private Jewish Day School. I threw myself into the project, but not because I was particularly interested in my son’s Jewish identity. We had not even joined a synagogue in Omaha—one of the few families who had not done so. But I was completely committed to not having first grade be a repeat of kindergarten. I wanted him to love school, to love learning, to be excited about going to school.

So we established a Private Jewish Day School and the first thing we did was to steal one of the most creative, wonderful teachers in Omaha, a woman named Lucille Saunders who had over 40 years of teaching experience in five or six states, was an ex-nun who believed in the freedom and creativity of the British primary schools—from one of the Catholic Schools. They were paying her about $12,500, and we increased her salary by about $1,500 and gave her complete autonomy in setting up her kindergarten and first grade; we opened with about 12 or 13 kids. There were five in my son’s first grade class.

Now I must say one thing: had I not experienced first hand my son’s painful kindergarten experience, there is no way I would ever have done such a rash thing in 1980. Forming a private school with almost no funding is a prescription for migraine headaches. Every parent involved wants to run the school. No one knows the first thing about developing and building a quality school. The lines of authority between teachers, the administrator (if you are lucky enough to have one), and parents are blurred beyond belief. It’s a total mess.

So when one finds a school like the Living Wisdom School that has been flourishing for some time, I must say it is a remarkable achievement, for building an effective private school from the ground up is an incredible achievement. I know. I suspect for the first three years of establishing the Jewish Day School of Omaha, I put in an extra 20-25 hours a week. It was like another full-time job psychologically, filled with frustration. We had to get rid of our first two administrators—one who thankfully left and took another job, the second whom we had to fire. And that is awful: to bring someone in to run your private school and then to have to fire them because they cannot do the job well. Painful stuff.

Living Wisdom School

Thus, let me say some things about the Living Wisdom School that most of you know all too well. What I will say is not earthshaking, but I hope some of it hits home and awakens your sense of appreciation and gratitude for the great gift that you have been given with this school, its remarkable culture, its talented, dedicated, creative teachers, and its splendid leadership.

First of all a school is not merely classes, teachers, and academic instruction—however critical those are. It is primarily a normative culture whose value commitments infuse the air that your children breathe, a culture which your students are interacting with every day in ways that affect the cultivation of their habits, attitudes, and values. A culture can be a unified one or a fragmented one, but one thing that a culture embodies, as all of you know, is “a way of life.” —it is defined by its core beliefs and values; it is embodied in its most sacred rituals; it is lived by its members, and it is passed on by its adherents.

So what makes the culture of the Living Wisdom School special? Let us take its yearly play as an embodiment of that culture. What does the play tells us about the school? First of all, it speaks volumes about what the school represents symbolically. It represents a commitment to the creation of a “caring community.”

Caring community

What is a caring community? Let’s break this notion down into its two components: community and caring. What is a community? For John Dewey, one of my favorite philosophers and the perceived “enemy of the far right”—a community was a group of people united by a set of core values and goals. The community of Living Wisdom School is unified by its goals—the goal of fostering the creative spirit and creative impulses of each and every child, the goal of helping each child learn how to get along and cooperate with his/her fellow classmates and not just those in the same class but those older and younger in the school.

How inspiring it is to see a play where all 55 children are contributing at their fullest level of skill, reciting poems, enacting dialogue, playing multiple roles, singing, dancing, reciting, acting—and doing so in creative unison to dramatize the life of an inspiring spiritual figure whose words and deeds embody the highest ideal of the human spirit. My wife and I have been to only the last two plays. But there is an expression in Yiddish that summarizes how we felt as we watched them—and remember we don’t have any children in the school; we don’t even know any of the children in the school. The word that summarizes how we felt is “we qvelled when we watched this play.” To qvell is to be swollen with pride—to be filled up with joyful pride. Filled up to the point of bursting with pleasure. That is how we felt when my daughter was married and the evening ceremony went like clock-work, and she looked radiant in her wedding gown.

That is how we felt when we watched the kindergartners and first graders, second graders, third graders—all the way to the 8th graders do their parts. There was a sense of wonderment and awe. How could these kids do this? Well, the answer was simple—they were directed, inspired, helped, guided, encouraged, and led by wonderful teachers, parents, friends to do it. They were allowed to do it, supported in doing it. And the result was a celebration of their creativity and an embodiment of what a caring community can achieve when it commits itself totally to something like this.

So a certain kind of community is a place that unifies two complementary features into one whole—a commitment to the welfare of the group and a simultaneous commitment to the individuality of each person. Neither the group’s well being nor the individual’s uniqueness is sacrificed to the other. This requires a special kind of wisdom on the part of the school’s leadership and all of the teachers, but all of you have seen this wisdom being practiced here virtually every day.

Caring

So now let me turn to the concept of “caring.” A community is really the social correlate of “caring,” but “caring” can also be conceived of through an understanding of a “caring encounter” and a “caring relationship.”

Noddings tells us that a “caring encounter,” something your children experience every day in this school, has several critical dimensions. The most important dimension is an openness to receiving the other person as “a unique individual.” When we care, we open ourselves up to accepting and receiving the other in his/her full otherness, in his/her full individuality—we accept and receive the other’s thoughts and feelings without critical judgment—for understanding and accepting the other is more important than judging him or her. To be “cared for” in a caring encounter is to be fully received, fully accepted, fully appreciated. It is to be validated in one’s essential human-ness. It is to be affirmed in one’s basic value as a person with worth and dignity. There is no substitute for this kind of “caring” in becoming a healthy person who can go on to live a flourishing life.

Before I began my efforts to establish a Jewish Day School, I did not fully appreciate the role of caring teachers in a young person’s life. I was worried about my son’s cognitive development. But it did not take long for me to see the light. A child who is not cared for by his teacher is a child who suffers great pain, a child whose spirit can begin to shrivel, a child whose vulnerability is threatened. One can make an analogy to a flower and sunlight. A child who is not cared for is like a flower who does not receive enough sunlight and withers. A child who is properly cared for is like a flower coming into bloom. So be grateful that your children are having daily caring encounters in the Living Wisdom School. They are like flowers coming into bloom. Be thankful for that.

Caring relationships

Now, a caring relationship is something more than a “caring encounter” or even a set of caring encounters. It is exactly what it is—a reciprocal relationship between one caring and one cared for. I can speak only of the teachers I know best, but I am sure what I say of them applies to others. I would experience not one iota of doubt in turning my children over to them for the several years that they bring up your children in this school. Why? Because every one of their children will be in a “caring relationship” with them. At the core of a caring relationship is one thing: a complete, unqualified dedication to the wellbeing of the one cared for. I repeat: a complete, unqualified dedication to the well being of the one cared for.

How could one ask for more? But one gets even more with these two remarkable persons. One gets the incredible compassion and wisdom that each of them brings to the task of nurturing your children’s growth. Conceivably one could be dedicated to the wellbeing of the other and lack good judgment. One could lack inner psychological security and thus try to meet one’s needs through one’s students.

Mariah helps a fellow middle-school student understand a lesson at Living Wisdom School in Palo Alto, CA
Mariah helps a fellow middle-school student understand a lesson at Living Wisdom School in Palo Alto, CA. (Click to enlarge.)

In my own Ethics of Teaching unit for secondary teachers, I have them read a novel and see a film—The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (played by Maggie Smith in the movie). Miss Jean Brodie is “dedicated to her students” but she does not know how to care for them because her own narcissistic needs are too great; her self-deception is too powerful. She does not want them to flourish as independent creative spirits but seeks to make them into little Miss Jean Brodie “clones”.

That is not what you want for your children, but what you get from these wonderful teachers and from others in the school is the cultivation of creative, caring children—ones who are coming to understand in powerful ways what all students need to do to become effective social persons—care for and appreciate their classmates, learn to cooperate with them, learn to work with them to produce something that is larger than ourselves—like a fabulous school play, and learn to be the best persons that they can be.

Standardized tests in public schools

I want to conclude with a reminder of how special this school is in light of what is going on in America’s K-12 schools. What is being talked about there: how do we improve students test scores? How do we punish schools and teachers and administrators whose students do not perform well on these tests? In schools where less than 95% of the kids show up, they are stigmatized. Consider the vision of schooling that is embodied in this movement. Schooling is reduced to cognitive achievement and cognitive achievement is reduced to scoring well on high stakes tests.

Now one does not want to diminish the importance of teaching kids how to do well on pressurized tests, but is that what you want for your child’s growth as a young person? Where is the cultivation of creativity, cultural understanding, the capacity to care for others and relate productively with them, where is music, art, drama, or philosophy in these standardized tests and the paranoia accompanying their outcomes. The public schools are now massively regulated—not by any ideal of developing an educated person—but by what society considers intolerable: producing kids with diplomas who cannot read or do basic math; that is why were are regulating the public schools to focus on test scores—because we are producing so many students whose diplomas do not represent minimal achievements in literacy.

Conclusion

So, compare two rituals—massive numbers of kids next week in California’s public schools will be assembled to take their standardized tests. Living Wisdom School’s community just dramatized another incredible life of a Chinese compassionate sage—after months of remarkable cooperative effort. In which environment would a child flourish and develop his or full human potential to live a joyful, creative life? The answer for me is quite clear. The School of Living Wisdom—a school which represents a precious, far too uncelebrated accomplishment of dedicated wise, caring teachers, inspired leadership, wonderful parental participation, and beautiful children. I feel honored to speak with you this morning; I feel honored to be connected, however indirectly, to the School of Living Wisdom. In turn I marvel at its spirit, I embrace its visionary ideal, and I celebrate its remarkable accomplishments. I urge us all to spread this word on how special a place it really is. Thank you for listening.

Biography

Professor Michael S. Katz, Professor of Philosophy and Education at San Jose State University, presently teaches courses in applied philosophy; these include courses in moral issues and philosophy of education; his present area of research expertise is the “ethics of teaching.” Dr. Katz has also served on the Executive Council of the San Jose State Senate, recently chairing the policy committee on Professional Standards. Dr. Katz has recently co-authored two articles with Dr. Michael Miller on democracy and academic governance, one of which was a chapter in the NEA Almanac. His most recent paper presentations have been on the topics of : 1) trust and trustworthiness in teacher-student relationship; and 2) a philosophical analysis of the “right to an education.”

Dr. Katz received his B.A. from Amherst College, an M.A. and Ph.D. (1974) from Stanford University. He is the author of over 30 articles in journals such as Educational Theory, Interchange, The Journal of Learning Disabilities, The Journal of Teacher Education, Planning and Changing, and Philosophy of Education. He is the co-editor, along with Nel Noddings and Kenneth Strike, of a recent book on ethics and education: Justice and Caring: The Search for Common Ground in Education (Teachers College Press, 1999). Dr. Katz has also taught at The University of Nebraska at Omaha, San Francisco State, Stanford, and The American University (Washington, D.C.) where he chaired the doctoral program in higher education. He has served as Secretary-Treasurer of The Philosophy of Education Society of North America and the Executive Board of this Society; he also chairs an ad hoc Task Force on the Ethics of Education for the Philosophy of Education Society. Presently, he serves on the Editorial Board for Educational Theory and a new journal produced in England—the Journal of Ethics and Education.

SF Chronicle Article on Living Wisdom School

San Francisco Chronicle

Julie N. Lynem, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, October 13, 2000

Education for the Soul

More parents look for schools
to help kids cope with stress

Palo Alto, Friday mornings are a time to energize the spirit. Each week, the entire K-8 school assembles for the “circle,” in which students sing, recite affirmations and stretch their bodies in yoga poses before heading out for a walk in the neighborhood.

Then they hit the books.

With its holistic approach to education, Living Wisdom may seem too unconventional for many Bay Area parents. But turned off by the hypercompetitive dot-com world, where success is often measured in stock options for parents and high test scores for kids, some Bay Area families are opting for schools that nourish the heart and the mind.

“We chose not to go with the production-line version of education around here,” said Robert Freeman , an Internet company senior vice president, whose daughters Rachel, 6, and Robyn, 8, attend Living Wisdom. The school is on the property of the Ananda Church of Self-Realization, but is a separate entity with most students unaffiliated with the church.

“My wife and I believe that children should not be groomed to be consumers in society,” Freeman said. “They have a soul, and we want that to be nurtured, too.”

Young boy at Living Wisdom School in Palo Alto, California
Freedom from stress is not incompatible with academic excellence. The students at LWS find freedom from the fear of failure by learning to enjoy their studies even as they succeed, through constant support, step-by-step learning, and individual adaptation of the curriculum. (Click to enlarge.)

Increasingly, educators in both public and private schools are trying to help students cope with stress inside and outside of the classroom.

At some schools, students relieve anxiety by performing simple mental and physical exercises. Other schools emphasize self-expression and teach students how to resolve conflicts on their own.

  • At Odyssey School in San Mateo, a private middle school for gifted and talented children, students ring a gong and meditate each morning. Students also can talk about and resolve their problems in a class called “self-science.”
  • Open Alternative School, a K-2 public school in Sebastopol, incorporates exercise and deep breathing into the school day. Students also begin and end the day with a class meeting, where they share their experiences while sitting on soft furniture.
  • Roquel Shields-Colbert, a counselor at Lowell Middle School, a public school in West Oakland, counsels separate groups of boys and girls. She teaches students to deal with peer pressure and manage their anger.
  • Students at Ohlone Elementary School, an alternative public school in Palo Alto, learn how to practice kindness when interacting with fellow classmates. They can work in the school’s garden or participate in a counseling program.
  • Teachers there recently attended a workshop sponsored by Six Seconds, a nonprofit San Mateo group that promotes emotional intelligence — the ability to recognize one’s own emotions, develop strategies to manage them and have empathy for others.
  • In Joanie Alper’s kindergarten class at Fiesta Gardens Elementary School, a public school in San Mateo, students listen to the soothing sounds of Mozart and move into a yoga pose when they’re overwhelmed.

Faced with mounds of homework, high expectations from parents and peer pressure, students are in need of more than an occasional timeout, educators and psychologists say.

Peter Mangione, a developmental and educational psychologist, said parents today often push their children into activities before they’re ready. With both parents working longer hours, children are squeezed into adult schedules, he said.

“Children become a part of this hurry syndrome,” said Mangione, whose own children attend a private elementary school in Menlo Park that he said emphasizes play, art and music.

Children who learn basic coping strategies at an early age lead healthier adult lives, said Suzanne Flint, a child-life specialist.

Flint, who is trained to guide children through painful medical procedures, has received a grant from the Imagination Foundation in Marin to offer an eight-week workshop — “Surfing through Stress” — for 7- to 10-year-olds at Stanford Hospital’s Complementary Medicine Clinic.

Through guided imagery, meditation, yoga and play, Flint hopes to provide stress relief for children who may be anxious about school or problems at home. Eventually, she wants to bring these ideas into Bay Area classrooms.

“I think sometimes, we’re so focused on a child’s academic achievements that we don’t look at personal development,” she said. “There’s so much more to learning than reading, writing and arithmetic.”

School s should offer opportunities for students to vent, said Thomas Tutko, a retired San Jose State University professor of clinical psychology.

“They have their own body of anxiety that emerges, plus their parents’ model, but they don’t have an opportunity to talk about it,” he said. “Students are subject to observing all of this stress, but how do we expect them to maintain normalcy?”

But while educators and psychologists generally agree that students should put stress in its proper perspective, some say parents should not simply look to schools for strategies to handle difficult situations in their children’s lives.

“I think if parents want to make their children’s lives less stressful, they need to do it themselves,” said Janine Bempechat, an associate professor of education at Harvard University ‘s Graduate School of Education. “I think parents need to tally up what they do in a given day and week and sort out what is a necessary activity and what is a discretionary activity. ”

“It’s really overstressed parents looking to the schools for help when they should be looking inward.”

All students handle stress differently, said Thomas Spencer, a developmental psychology professor at San Francisco State University . But the extremes of having too much stress or not enough are not good for children.

“The standards have been reduced, in many cases, so much that stress results when you have too much structure,” Spencer said. “You also get stress when you have unclear expectations. Children function best when they’re in a situation where they know what’s going on.”

Menlo Park parent Leslie Levy said Living Wisdom is the right choice for her 8-year-old son, Niko. Levy considered public schools, but she found them to be too rigid. Living Wisdom, she said, offers a strong academic program without the intense competitive attitudes.

“The best way to learn is to feel confident and supported and secure — that’s what opens the doors of children’s minds,” she said. “If they’re constantly worried that they’re not going to get it right, then it shuts kids down. Maybe it will be an adjustment when he leaves Living Wisdom, but I’m willing to take that risk.”

© 2001 San Francisco Chronicle

Teach Character First, Then Content — SJ Mercury News

For success in schools, teach character first, then content

by Robert Freeman

This article appeared in the San Jose Mercury News on March 3, 2008. Robert Freeman teaches economics and history at Los Altos High School in Los Altos, California.

Robert Freeman, history and economics teacher, Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District, California
Robert Freeman, history and economics teacher, Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District, California

Mark Twain once wrote, “Everybody talks about the weather but nobody does anything about it.” He may just as well have been writing about education.

We’ve tried smaller class sizes, more testing, better teacher training, longer school years, charters, technology and, of course, that perennial elixir, more money. Nothing seems to work.

The reason is that all of these “fixes” assume that the student is a product, something to be built, tested and packaged for use. They overlook the two most critical things that matter in education: that character is more important than content; and that it is the student – much more than the teacher or school – who ultimately determines success.

Until our reform efforts reflect those two realities, they will only deliver more frustration and failure.

The idea that character is more important than knowledge is readily understood by most parents. It is character they are inculcating when they remind their child, “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.”

A child with strong character will find the way to whatever knowledge he or she desires or needs. He will be much more able and willing to learn, no matter what the grade or subject.

The reverse is equally true: Knowledge without character is impotent or, worse, malevolent. Weak or conflicted character becomes its own worst enemy, both in school and in life.

What does this say about how we should reform our schools?

First, we need to cultivate high standards of character just as much as we do high standards of content. Honesty, discipline, compassion, patience, perseverance and self-respect will help the student excel in school as well as in life.

Academic content should be used as a vehicle for cultivating character. How many of us remember our trigonometry, our chemistry or our French verb conjugations? Virtually none of us.

What we remember is how to stay with a problem, how to meet deadlines, how to present our work with pride, how to ask for help if we need it and how to help others when they need it. With these skills, any discipline can be mastered. Without them, none can.

Second, teachers need to model the primacy of character over content. It is not what I say that speaks to the child, it is what I do. This is the same as in parenting, isn’t it?

If I am an engaged teacher, interested in each student’s welfare, curious about the world, passionate about my subject and embodying integrity and dignity in all of my acts, the children will see it. They will esteem it. It’s not so much what I teach that they learn, it is what I am.

Finally, we need to enlist the students as active participants in the development of their own characters. They’re not products on an assembly line, receiving bolted-on, prepackaged knowledge components, although too often our schools work as if that were the case.

Boy gives his "qualities" speech at the end of year ceremony, Living Wisdom School, Palo Alto, CA
Even the youngest students at LWS are supported in developing basic character strengths, such as the confidence and poise to speak to an audience of 200 fellow students and parents at the annual end-of-year “Qualities” ceremony. (Click to enlarge.)

Students need to understand that character is both the end and the means of a good education and that it is they who are most responsible for it. With that in hand, and with supportive teachers, content comes easily, no matter what the subject.

Focusing on character enables students to transcend the limitations of race, which is too often an excuse for under-achievement. Race is a bitter, fateful trap, for students can never change theirs. But they can build stronger character every day and, with it, become effective in any circumstance and in any society.

Information? Knowledge? Intellect? These, of course, are critical in today’s hyper-competitive world. No sane person would discount them. But they are actually the easiest things to teach.

It is the deeper elements of character that are harder to cultivate and, therefore, so much more valuable: How do you discern good information from bad? What knowledge is it you aspire to? How do you use intellect wisely?

It is these gifts that will stand the test of time, that will bear fruits of self-respect, confidence and ease with oneself in the world. These are the true ends and the true measures of education. It is in this direction that we need to focus our efforts for reform.